______________________________________________________
How to clean up the political mess?
India happens to be the largest democratic
country in the world. Compared to other democratic countries, our country has
the largest number of voters and also, the largest number of political parties.
Recently, the hunger for political power has prompted a spurt of unethical
political scenarios in our country. The contemporary happenings are in direct
conflict with the dreams that freedom fighters of pre-independence era had
about the future of our country. Giving up comforts and sacrificing lives for
their country were the coveted virtues in that period. But the current state of
affairs seems to project a feeling that the democracy exists solely for the
welfare of the politicians and not of the public. Once elected, there is no
limit for their atrocities. Corruption
is rampant and spreading in demonic proportions. In this regard, the proposals
endorsed by Anna Hazare have been warmly received by the general public and as
a result, the Lokpal Bill has become the subject of wide spread discussions.
Well planned efforts to discredit and weaken its popularity are in motion as
well. In fact, there is no guarantee that even this Bill would succeed in
eradicating the corruption. This is clearly evident in Hazare’s statement,
“Even if I myself contest in the elections, I will not win.” It would not be a
surprise if the Lokpal Bill meets the same fate as the “Ban Party Crossover”
Bill. It will be transformed into a toy
snake in no time. Corruption is like a wild weed. It is better to prevent it
from sprouting than trying to pull it out after it is fully grown. In my
opinion, there are a few easy plans to clean up this “Ram came, Ram went and
everything is safe and sound” type of political mess. I would like to share
them with you.
After the elections are over and the results are
out, everyone’s focus will be on grabbing the fatter chairs. Power becomes the
prime objective while caring for people’s comforts takes a back seat. The
majority party will hold the power. In case of any deficiency in gaining
majority, it will be corrected by hook or crook. If there is an instability
situation, the legislators get traded like horses.
Those in the opposition party do not sit still
either. They try to pull a few legislators from the majority party into their
hold. They are constantly on the lookout to dethrone the ruling party. The
ruling party will try hard to retain power while those in the opposition will
try to snatch it away from them. People are frustrated by watching, listening,
and reading about these sensationalizing maneuvers. The infant deflates when parents fight! There is no time for the
legislators and the ministers to attend to the plight of the farmers. They are
engaged, fulltime, in the political sea-saw for their own selfish needs.
The situation is such that if you ask anyone,
“what party are you in?” his predictable response probably would be like, “the
party that is ready to give me a ticket to contest.” On seeing this kind of
people, I am reminded of a bitterly harsh vachana of Basavanna where he asks, “Could we call a woman, who says every man
she meets is her husband, as virtuous?” His statement, of course, is in
reference to the relationship that exists between a devotee and a deity. A
married woman cannot call every man on the street as her husband. Such a woman
is not considered virtuous. Basavanna himself says on another occasion, “There is but one husband for a trusted
wife, one God for a trustable devotee, No, no, more than one God is nothing but
prostitution.” A true devotee should have trust in one God, should worship
one God. Shifting Gods citing that their wish is not fulfilled is nothing short
of prostitution. Sadly, such prostitution is the practice of the day among all
political parties that exist today.
Party loyalty does not exist among members of
any political party. Ethical Proclamation is only hearsay. Power-mongering is
the working tactic of all the parties. A political atmosphere prevails where
anyone who is wealthy can contest anytime from any party. Within the party
itself, a culture is developing where in the loyal workers are overlooked and
those with the money are heralded. Without studying the strengths of the
candidate in the opposing party and ignoring the suitable candidate within the
party who could prevail over the opposition, a political treachery that seeks
to drag an unsatisfied individual from the opposition into their own party fold
by granting a party ticket is increasing. A few relatively easy plans listed
below to restrict ‘the resort politics and operations’ that are transparent in
Karnataka, in my opinion, are worth considering:
·
It
should be mandatory for each political party to register the list of its
members in the election panel just as the members from various parties register
their names in the Registrar’s office. The candidate wishing to contest from
any party should have been a member of that party for a minimum of five years.
Anyone with even a day less than five years in the party should be made
ineligible to contest from that party.
·
In
the event of a switch over from one political party to the other, such
candidate should be unable to obtain a ticket to contest from that party. A
five year waiting period should be mandatory before a ticket is granted.
·
An
amendment should be made to the existing “Ban Party Cross-over” rule. Ban
should be applicable for group crossovers as well.
·
Any
candidate who has won an election from a particular party feels suffocated from
internal politics of the party should be able to resign and contest as an
independent in the elections.
·
Candidates
who have won an election as independents should not be allowed to join any
other political party. They could give external support to the government, but
should be ineligible to join the cabinet ministry.
·
All
arbitration committees created to satisfy the unhappy legislators unable to
land a cabinet post should be dissolved completely. The business that was
conducted by such committees should be carried on by the concerned ministries.
·
The
rigid requirement to have a majority to form the government should be relaxed.
The party with the largest number of votes should be able to form the
government. If a candidate with 25,000 votes in a constituency of 1, 50,000 voters
could be declared a winner due to distribution of votes among several
candidates, then why should a party with majority votes not be able to form a
government?
·
We
cannot say that everything a ruling party does is right. The mentality of the
opposition party should not be to oppose everything that the ruling party does.
A bill needs a majority to be passed in the assembly. The ruling party should
have the welfare of the people as their objective in submitting a bill to the
assembly. A good bill should be such that the opposition party should be scared
to oppose it in the assembly.
My
good hearted readers, the need to control our bullish legislators who are no
better than the wolves that are assigned to watch over the hapless sheep, is an
urgent one.
Translated
by
Dr Annapur Shivakumar
Chicago, USA